Karin Proves Me Right!

Karin Jansen has done the unthinkable.

She has proven me correct.

For any still on the fence about what the Natalee Holloway case was always about, it should be very clear now. It was always about Paulus Van Der Sloot.



According to information discovered by Diario in the case of Natalee Holloway, Ms. Jansen has left a dossier of evidence behind. (NOT part of the 400 KGs. of documents sent to the Netherlands for analysis.) In the dossier is a statement / declaration / tape indicating two people overheard Paulus Van Der Sloot admit he picked up Joran AND NATALEE HOLLOWAY AT 4 AM and NOT 11 PM at the Palm Beach McDonald's as he contended he was mistakenly overheard as he gave a statement outside his home in the early hours of the investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

According to Diario, the individuals are Arubans and would not have a language barrier.

Now I could write here about what a total and complete failure Paulus Van Der Sloot is, but that has all been documented and discussed to the point that there isn't much more that can be said about a man with no soul that hasn't been said again and again.

So, how do I come to the conclusion that this is all about Paulus Van Der Sloot?

First of all, that is Paulus Van Der Sloot on the casino video. He is engaging Natalee Holloway in some type of disarming small talk. Natalee, while talking to Paulus, points toward Joran as if to say, 'Oh that's your son?' Now why would she point in the direction of Joran as if not to acknowledge it is Paulus Van Der Sloot's son? Ed Kissel's statement indicates the MB students had seen Joran around the Holiday Inn, and according to other statements Joran had met Natalee before the night at the casino.

People playing cards often engage in talk with other players. There is nothing unusual about that. From what has been seen of the casino video, neither Natalee or Paulus are playing cards, but seem to just be observing others. Whether more of that video exists has yet to be seen. Also, not seen is the entry and exit times of both Paulus and Joran Van Der Sloot. Such a segment has been made public of Natalee Holloway's entry and exit. Her time-line is in the casino has been established. Paulus seems to have some desire to engage a teenager in conversation. That is the odd part. Why is a middle aged man engaging Natalee Holloway is a conversation? Is this middle aged man so attention deprived he needs reassurance from an 18 year old?

I have noticed that two important facts have been overlooked by virtually everyone.

First, if Paulus did in fact pick up Joran and Natalee at 4 AM, his whereabouts are unaccounted for from the time he is spotted on that casino video and 4 AM. Where was Paulus this entire time?

Second, According to Joran, he snuck out of his home at 11 PM, yet was not picked up until 12:15 - 12:25 AM by the Kalpoe's. Where was Joran from the time he left the casino and 12:15 - 12:25 AM? I doubt he is sitting in his front yard waiting for the Kalpoe's to arrive. If Paulus Van Der Sloot is not home, as he claims, it is unlikely that Joran snuck out at all, and could have been out and about from the time he exits the casino and wherever the Kalpoe's actually pick him up.

You have two of the main suspects with unaccounted for time. According to Joran, Paulus went home to feed a brother dinner . As with everything Joran has said, you can bet that is a lie also. He has no credibility. Early reports have Paulus Van Der Sloot returning from Holland via Curacao to Aruba alone. The other children traveled with Anita Van Der Sloot when she returned on Wednesday.

Gardener kills alibi.

The Gardener spotted three people in the vehicle of Deepak Kalpoe. Joran Van Der Sloot was seated in the driver seat, while Deepak Kalpoe was seated in the front passenger seat. The third person in the back seat was unable to be identified by the Gardener. The Gardener has given sworn testimony as to what he saw and to date has not been dis-credited. In fact, he along with the Jogger are the only two witnesses that I find credible at this time. Neither wavered from the original account. Although both appear to be no where in sight and seem to have been deported.

The Gardener spotted those three in the Aruba Racquet club area between 2:30 AM and 3 AM. The Jogger places them in the vicinity at roughly the same time.

Now even on the magical land of Aruba where statements and evidence vanish like a Adam Steinfeld Production,

a suspect can not be in two places at once. It's physically impossible. Joran and Deepak were not at the Van Der Sloot home when Natalee placed the call where she states, 'I don't know these guys / people.'

3 AM call Aruban Time or 4 AM Alabama Time. One hour difference for Central Time only and NOT Daylight Savings Time.

If Joran and Deepak are not at the home when the call is made, only one person has admitted to being in the home during those hours. That person is Paulus Van Der Sloot. According to Paulus Van Der Sloot, he slept through the night, and did not make any phone calls. We later learned that Paulus Van Der Sloot was not telling the truth here either. He later admitted to Van Tuys that he may have made some call(s) between 2 AM and 7 AM. Paulus Van Der Sloot contradicted his own statement again and blew his own credibility.

We also later discovered, that Paulus Van Der Sloot was up that night looking up the effects of drugs and alcohol on teenagers. And let's not forget, the ever incriminating, search for attorneys during the same night. Searching for one or the other itself is not a nail in the coffin, but the two together allow a reasonable person to conclude that a problem with drugs and / or alcohol exist and an attorney is now needed. The time had passed for an ambulance by his actions.

Paulus Van Der Sloot - "If Natalee is never found," Paul says, "it will always, always hit our lives, not only the lives of the Holloways, but also our lives."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/30/earlyshow/main802484.shtml

Why would the lives of the Van Der Sloot's be affected if they have nothing to hide and are in fact innocent?

In the above statement Paulus Van Der Sloot gives you a detailed look at his psyche. He never helped look for Natalee. He obstructed the investigation from the first moments. He fought to have the FBI excluded from the search for Natalee. FBI divers were not permitted to search along the coast.


It was Paulus all along. Karin had the initial charges correct. What happened afterward is becoming more clear every day.